Alexandria Dinh

Alexandria DinhAlexandria DinhAlexandria DinhAlexandria Dinh
  • Home
  • About

Alexandria Dinh

Alexandria DinhAlexandria DinhAlexandria Dinh
  • Home
  • About

Currently working to minimize reading length of this page, thanks for your patience :)

Currently working to minimize reading length of this page, thanks for your patience :)

Currently working to minimize reading length of this page, thanks for your patience :)

Currently working to minimize reading length of this page, thanks for your patience :)

Currently working to minimize reading length of this page, thanks for your patience :)

Currently working to minimize reading length of this page, thanks for your patience :)

Usability analysis: ASU PARKING PORTAL

Overview: Evaluating the user experience of purchasing a permit on the ASU Parking Portal website

Problem  

The Arizona State University (ASU) Parking and Transit Services website allows students to purchasing parking permits via the Parking Portal. The purpose of online purchasing is to provide students a convenient way to purchase permits from anywhere. However, an informal initial count showed that students tend to have issues using the online method which leads them to giving up halfway through the process and not acquiring a permit. The webpage’s layout does not satisfy common website usability principles such as easy navigation, satisfactory user interface, seamless pathways, and inclusion of relevant content. 


Goals of this usability study:

  • Determine site's user pain points, collect user feedback of current design
  • Establish and validate user performance measures
  • Provide design recommendations
  • Improve efficiency, productivity, and level of user satisfaction

Role 

UX Research


Year

Fall 2021 Capstone

research

Methodology

  • ~30 minute, 1-on-1 sessions were held
    • In-person usability study at ASU Student Union/classrooms 
    • Using the ASU Parking Portal site and the participant's personal laptop 
    • Each session screen and audio recorded 
  • Participants were observed going through the tasks to purchase a permit with minimal guidance; subjects were asked to think aloud while completing tasks 
  • Task success rate was rated using the following definitions:
  • Success: User follows the intended path and completes all parts of the task
  • Partial Success: User requires minimal prompts to aid completion of a task, or participants is only able to partially complete a task
  • Failure: User does not complete any parts of the task
  • After each task, participants indicated their perceived ease of use using a 5-point Likert scale
  • After each session, participants took a post-study questionnaire measuring product satisfaction 

Participants

The chart displays participant demographics

5 ASU students with no previous experience using the Parking Portal were studied; 3 males, 2 females



Task list summary

Participants were asked to complete the following tasks

  1. Starting on https://asuparking.t2hosted.com/cmn/auth_ext.aspx, login
  2. Suppose you are trying to buy a yearlong permit for ASU Polytechnic campus, what would you do?
  3. Select a permit to buy
  4. Add a vehicle to be linked to the permit
  5. Select delivery method
  6. Enter payment information


Task completion

Rated task difficulty

Rated task difficulty

Users struggled with Tasks 1,2, and 3

*One task failure not shown in the graph for Task 2.

Rated task difficulty

Rated task difficulty

Rated task difficulty

Tasks 2 and 3 were on average rated most difficult. These tasks were the most common points of error and needed thorough review

Executive summary

  • Users took an extended amount of time to find the "get a permit" button; words did not come across as clickable
  • Users felt information was not delivered appropriately; i.e. irrelevant content, important missing content, disorganized order of information 
  • Participants did not see value in the color theme
  • Layout was given high remarks as "simple" but "bland" 
  • Several users expected a map to be involved in the process
  • Users expressed preference in knowing about the required vehicle information before starting the process

User Feedback

  • The design and layout of the site was overall clean
    • "This is very simple and straightforward" 
    • "It looks clean"
    • "I'd describe this as clean/simple"
  • The amount of content provided was described as disorganized and unhelpful
    • "The flow of info is just weird, it doesn't make sense- there is too much being thrown at me" 
    • "I can't tell which part of information is important, the paragraphs are just not nice to look at" 
    • "I can't find information that I actually need"
  • Many users found that the words "Purchase a parking permit" were not recognizable as a link
    • "I couldn't tell that I could click on it" 
    • "I missed it because it doesn't look like a button"
    • "You can't tell that those words are a link" 
  • Users suggested a brighter color theme
    • "The colors on this reminds me of an old, outdated cube computer from the early 2000s" 
    • "I'm not sure about the coloring, I think there are better (more inviting) colors to use" 
    • "It looks straightforward, no frills, but kind of bland" 

Issues and Recommendations

UX Severity Defined

UX Severity Defined

UX Severity Defined

  

●High: Fix urgently. This usability problem will make some users unwilling or unable to complete a common task. 

●Medium: Fix as soon as possible. This usability problem will significantly slow down some users when completing a common task and may cause users to find a workaround. 

●Low: Fix during the next "business as usual" update. This is a quality problem, for example a cosmetic issue or a spelling error, but will not affect task completion. While these may be minor issues in isolation, too many "lows" will negatively affect perceptions of a product’s usability, accuracy, and value.

UX Severity Defined

UX Severity Defined

Recommendations are prioritized in terms of their impact on usability   

*Methodology defined by Dr. David Travis

Task 1

Task 1

Task 1

Medium severity- Some users found it difficult to determine whether to sign in to "affiliate" or "guest" login 

 ○Users did not know if they were considered an “affiliate” 

 ○2 users found the terms “guest” and “affiliate” difficult to understand  

○Several users gave feedback that the login page had unhelpful words on it (“Customer Authentication”, “Validation Provider”) which made the task more confusing 


Recommendations- 

●Replace the login terms with “Guest” and “ASU Student/Faculty”

●Change “Customer Authentication” to “Login”  

Task 2

Task 1

Task 1

 ●High severity- Users found it difficult to locate where to buy a permit

○Many users scrolled up and down page & took awhile to locate the “Get a permit” button

○Users did not realize that the words “Purchase a parking permit” were clickable 

●Medium severity- Users described the order of information on the page as “unorganized”

○Users felt the informational content on the page was irrelevant and “distracted away” from the main task 

○Users felt that the information was not organized in a way that made sense (the welcome message was misplaced, permits section should be above citations section)

○Users felt that the permits section was more popular and significant than the citations section; meaning it should appear higher than the citations section


Recommendations-

●Create a larger/more visible “Get a permit” button

●Create options that appear as a button or as a hyperlink  ●Switch the order of the Permits section to come before the Citation section 

Task 2- Recommendations continued

Task 2- Recommendations continued

Task 2- Recommendations continued

 ●Reorganize the information so that the “Welcome” message is first, followed by “Permit Availability”, and finally the “Reminder” message

Task 3

Task 2- Recommendations continued

Task 2- Recommendations continued

  ●High severity- Users found it difficult to complete this step without a map of the parking lots 

○All users had remarks of expecting a map in this step 

○4 users described it as an “inconvenience” to open another tab to find a map of ASU parking lots 

○1 user said that the lot descriptions were not sufficient 

●High severity- Users found the amount of information overwhelming  

○4 users found the information included irrelevant 

○2 users called this page “wordy”  


Recommendations-

●Include a map of the parking lots 

●Reduce the amount of information provided in this step by eliminating unnecessary information 

Task 3- Recommendations continued

Task 3- Recommendations continued

Task 3- Recommendations continued

  • Create a pop-up link to read the rules & regulations, minimize amount of words displayed on page

Task 4

Task 3- Recommendations continued

Task 3- Recommendations continued

●Medium severity- Users felt inconvenienced for having to pause the process to retrieve vehicle information  

○Users expressed that they would’ve preferred a list stating the required information before starting the process 

○2 users said they would’ve paused acquiring a permit online altogether under normal settings 

●Medium severity- Users felt there was too much information  

○3 users said the information was not helpful  

○4 users said they were not inclined to read the information due to amount of words 


Recommendations-

●Include a list of the required information that the user will need at the start of the procedure 

●Reduce the amount of words (utilize bullet points), eliminate unnecessary information, or relocate the information to a more fitting location   

Task 5

Task 5

Task 5

No severity- Users were able to select a delivery method


Recommendations-

 ●No recommendations for improvement    

Task 6

Task 5

Task 5

  ●None- Users were able to enter payment information 


Recommendations-

●No recommendations for improvement   

Results

  • Discovered 67% user pain points
  • Provided recommended modifications
  • Resolved  user pain points using 6 unique redesign goals to improve functionality, usability, and experience 

back to homepage

Copyright © 2023 Alexandria Dinh - All Rights Reserved.

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept